A structured view of the disclosures promoters and company insiders are legally required to file when they trade their own company's shares.
Insiders know their business better than any analyst. Their filings are public, and when they buy consistently with their own money, it is worth knowing about.
The tool opens inside your BreakPoint account. If you are not signed in yet you will be asked to sign in first, and access depends on your active plan.
When promoters, directors or designated employees trade shares in their own company, they are legally required to disclose it. Those disclosures are public, but they arrive as a scattered stream of filings that is difficult to read as a pattern.
This tool organises them: every transaction with the acquirer, the category they fall into, the type of security, whether it was a purchase or a sale and the quantity — plus aggregated views showing which companies are seeing the most buying, which insiders are most active, and where the same person has been buying repeatedly over the past month.
The important distinction it helps you make is between buying and selling. Insider buying has one plausible explanation: the person closest to the business thinks the shares are worth more than the price. Insider selling has many — tax, diversification, a house purchase, a pledge being unwound — which makes it far weaker as a signal.
Insider transactions are disclosed after they occur, so this is never a same-day signal. Its value is in the pattern over weeks, not in reacting to a single filing.
Almost every market signal is inferred. This one is disclosed.
Investors
Add a genuine information edge to fundamental research — the people running the company voting with their own capital.
Swing traders
Use sustained insider buying as a supporting reason to hold a technical setup longer than usual.
Researchers
Track which categories of insider are active and whether promoter behaviour differs from the rest of management.
Beginners
Learn to read a signal that requires no indicators and no charting skill at all.
Disclosed, not inferred
These are filings, not estimates. The transaction definitely happened.
Patterns, not filings
Repeated buying by the same insider over a month is visible as a pattern instead of a dozen separate documents.
Aggregate views
Top buying and selling companies show where insider conviction is concentrated across the market.
Promoter vs non-promoter
Separating the two matters — promoters and employees often act for different reasons.
Slow signal, long shelf life
Unlike intraday signals, insider activity stays relevant for weeks or months.
A conviction filter
Useful for deciding whether to hold through volatility in a position you already own.
A transaction feed with several summary views stacked around it.
Summary panels stack vertically and the transaction table scrolls horizontally, with row counts adjustable so you can page through on a small screen.
A weekly review is usually enough — this data does not reward daily checking.
Start with the buying side
Open the top buy companies view first. Buying carries a clearer message than selling and is where the useful signal concentrates.
Separate promoters from others
Promoter purchases generally carry more weight than those of a designated employee acting on a smaller scale.
Look for repetition
Check the continuous pattern view. One purchase is a data point; the same insider buying four times in a month is a statement.
Judge the size in context
Consider the quantity relative to the company and to that person's existing holding. A token purchase is not the same as a meaningful addition.
Check the price context
Insiders buying into a falling price is a stronger message than insiders buying after the stock has already doubled.
Cross-check the flow
Pair the filing with delivery and volume behaviour. Insider buying alongside sustained delivery-based accumulation is a much fuller picture.
Decide the horizon
Treat this as a positional signal. Insiders buy because of business prospects that unfold over quarters, not because of next Tuesday.
What each column tells you and how much weight to give it.
| Field | What it tells you | How to use it |
|---|---|---|
| Date | When the transaction was disclosed. | Recent filings matter most, but the pattern across a month matters more than any single date. |
| Symbol / Company | The company whose shares were transacted. | Your starting point for further research; the filing is a prompt, not a conclusion. |
| Acquirer | The individual or entity that transacted. | Watch for the same name appearing repeatedly — that is where conviction shows. |
| Category | Promoter, director, designated employee or other insider class. | Promoter activity generally carries the most weight; employee transactions are frequently routine. |
| Security Type | The instrument transacted — equity shares or other instruments. | Ordinary share purchases are the cleanest signal; other instruments may reflect compensation arrangements rather than a view on value. |
| Transaction | Whether it was a purchase or a disposal. | Buying is the informative side. Selling has many innocent explanations and should not be read as a verdict on the business. |
| Shares Transacted | The quantity involved. | Judge in context of company size and the insider's existing stake, not as an absolute number. |
| Continuous patterns | Repeated transactions by the same insider over the past month. | The strongest formation this data produces. Sustained buying is difficult to explain away. |
Four patterns, ordered from most informative to least.
A mid-cap stock has fallen roughly 20% over two months and looks unremarkable technically. The insider data shows the promoter has purchased shares four separate times in the last month, each time on a down day, in meaningful size.
The person with the best view of the business is repeatedly increasing exposure as the market marks the shares down. That does not make the stock go up, and it does not tell you when. What it does is change the question from "why is this falling?" to "what does the promoter see that the price does not reflect?" — which is a research prompt worth following.
For a positional investor this is a reason to study the company. For a trader it is a reason to be patient with a technical base once one forms, not a reason to buy today.
This is research data. Treated as a trading trigger it will frustrate you.
✅ Do this
⛔ Avoid this
Reading selling as bearish. Insiders sell for a long list of personal reasons that have nothing to do with the company's prospects, while there is really only one reason to buy. Treating the two symmetrically produces a lot of false conclusions.
When promoters, directors or designated employees trade shares in their own company, regulations require them to disclose it. These are legal, reported transactions — quite distinct from the illegal practice of trading on unpublished price-sensitive information.
It is one of the more meaningful signals available, because the buyer knows the business intimately and is committing personal capital. It is not a guarantee, and it says nothing about timing — insiders are often early.
People sell for many reasons unrelated to the company: taxes, diversification, personal expenses, unwinding pledges. Buying has essentially one explanation, which makes it far cleaner to interpret.
Promoters are the controlling owners of the company; non-promoter insiders include directors and designated employees. Promoter transactions typically involve larger stakes and carry more informational weight.
They are filed after the transaction, so the information always arrives with a delay. That is why the data is used as a research input over weeks rather than as a same-day trigger.
No. Insiders understand the business, not the market, and they are frequently early. The signal improves your odds over a long horizon; it does not remove the need for risk management.
Judge it relative to the company's size and to the insider's existing holding. A purchase that materially increases their personal exposure means considerably more than a token amount.
Use insider buying to decide what to watch, then wait for the chart to form a base or a level you can trade against. The filing supplies conviction; the chart supplies the entry and the stop-loss.
Cases where the same insider has transacted repeatedly over a period. Sustained, repeated buying is much harder to explain as routine than one isolated purchase.
Yes. These are public disclosures published precisely so that all market participants can see them. Using published information is entirely legitimate.
Not on that basis alone. Investigate the size, whether it is a repeated pattern, and whether an explanation has been disclosed. A single sale by one director rarely tells you anything about the business.
Weekly is plenty. The signal develops over months, and checking daily mostly produces noise and an urge to act on individually meaningless filings.
Every technical term above, written for someone who has never traded before.
Disclosed buying or selling by people who run the company.
Promoters and senior management must legally disclose their transactions in their own company's shares. These filings are public. Consistent buying by insiders is one of the few signals where the buyer genuinely knows the business better than the market does. Selling is noisier — it can simply mean a house purchase or tax planning.
The large, well-informed participants — funds and institutions.
Smart money is shorthand for participants who trade size: mutual funds, insurance companies, foreign institutions, proprietary desks. They cannot buy in one click without moving the price, so they accumulate quietly over days. That footprint — steady buying, unusual delivery, price defended at the same zone repeatedly — is what smart-money tools try to detect.
The share of the day's volume that people actually kept.
Not every trade is an investment. Intraday traders buy and sell the same day, so those shares are never delivered to a demat account. Delivery percentage strips those out and shows the share of volume held overnight. High delivery on a rising day suggests genuine accumulation rather than day-trading churn.
How easily you can get in and out at a fair price.
A liquid stock has enough daily turnover that your order does not move the price. Illiquid names look attractive on a scanner because their percentage moves are large, but the spread between buy and sell prices quietly eats those gains, and exiting in a fall can be difficult.
Holding for weeks to months.
Positional trading rides the larger trend and accepts deeper pullbacks along the way. It requires the fewest decisions and the most patience, and it lives on daily and weekly charts rather than minute-by-minute action.
The fall from a peak to the following trough.
Drawdown measures the pain in a strategy — how far your account fell from its high point before recovering. Two strategies with the same annual return are not equivalent if one of them got there through a 15% dip and the other through a 45% one.
Looking for a term that is not here? The full trading glossary covers every concept used across these guides.